Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Roberts v. Noe et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Respondent:
Guy Noe and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Noe et al
as 3:2019cv00294
Respondent:
Guy Noe and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Brown et al
as 7:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Kyle Brown and Harold Hughston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Bowling et al
as 7:2015cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Phillip Bowling, Timothy Howell, Kyle Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Hughston et al
as 7:2015cv00118
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Harold Hughston, Jr., Kyle Brown, Phillip Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Hughston et al
as 7:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Harold Hughston, Jr. and Kyle Brown
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Tom Roberts Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01566
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Tom Roberts Construction Co., Inc. and Thomas Scott Roberts, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv01397
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv01072
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
