Cases 31 - 40 of 1,591
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curtiss
Defendant:
Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cook County Dept of Correction et al
as 1:2023cv15038
Plaintiff:
Donyiell T. Brown
Defendant:
Cook County Dept of Correction, Cook County Sheriff Dept., Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barreto v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15033
Plaintiff:
Kim Barreto
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharkey v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15030
Plaintiff:
Markees Sharkey
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14745
Plaintiff:
Allen Patton
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, J. Crowell, J. Gust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronowski v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14497
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thomas Ronowski
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Mr. Klemick, T Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lua Morales v. Byrne et al
as 1:2023cv14307
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Thomas J. Byrne, Thomas Dart and LEASCAF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lua Morales v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14228
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cermack Health Services of Cook County and Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neb v. Martinez et al
as 1:2023cv14116
Plaintiff:
Kem Nefer Neb and Darrell McKee
Defendant:
Iris Martinez and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronowski v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14077
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thomas Ronowski
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Jones, A. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
