Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC v THOMAS E PRICE, et al
as 1:2017cv00245
Defendant:
THOMAS E PRICE and GEORGE LORENZO MORGAN
Plaintiff:
SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hoveround Corporation v. Price et al
as 8:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Hoveround Corporation
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price and Seema Verma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northwest ENT Associates, P.C. v. Price et al
as 4:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Northwest ENT Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price and Seema Verma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Northwest ENT Associates, P.C. v. Price et al
as 1:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
Northwest ENT Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price and Seema Verma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC et al v. PRICE et al
as 1:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
THOMAS E PRICE and DONALD SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Stubbs, M.D. v. Price, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv02091
Plaintiff:
Miguel Stubbs, M.D.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price, M.D. and Seema Verma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Sproule v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 9:2017cv80709
Plaintiff:
Justin Sproule
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration , United States Department of Health and Human Services and Thomas E Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Med-Care Diabetic and Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Price
as 9:2017cv80578
Plaintiff:
Med-Care Diabetic and Medical Supplies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas E Price
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
GILREATH v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00049
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Plaintiff:
ARTRELLA GILREATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
