Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Burke v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, Department of Corrections and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thomas Burke, Jr.In re: Thomas Burke, Jr.
as 22-5368
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR.
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden
Burke v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00047
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burke v. Crews et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Respondent:
Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson, Judge John R. Grise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Thomas Burke, Jr.
as 22-5145
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR.
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden
Burke v. People of the State of Kentucky
as 1:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
People of the State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Burke, Jr.In re: Thomas Burke, Jr.
as 20-6270
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Interim Warden
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR.
Burke v. People of the State of Kentucky et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of Kentucky and Amy Rodey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr et al v. People of the State of Kentucky et al
as 1:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Christopher T. Cohron, Governor Andy Beshear, People of the State of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr., THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR and Thomas Edward Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
