Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JACKSON et al v. GREATER PHILADELPHIA HEALTH ACTION INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2015cv05728
Plaintiff:
RENEE JACKSON
Defendant:
GREATER PHILADELPHIA HEALTH ACTION INCORPORATED , SOUTHEAST HEALTH CENTER , ANTHONY LUISTRO and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSENBERG v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.
as 2:2015cv04208
Plaintiff:
ANNE L. ROSENBERG
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. v. JEFFERSON HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
Defendant:
JEFFERSON HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. , MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. , THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WALSH v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.
as 2:2013cv03717
Petitioner:
DENNIS P. WALSH
Respondent:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
ELBAUM v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC.
as 2:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. ELBAUM
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
