Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SOLANO-MORETA v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00619
Plaintiff:
JORGE SOLANO-MORETA
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS and THOMAS KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DENT v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00531
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, MARK S. INCH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARROCA v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01570
Petitioner:
ROBERT W. BARROCA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and THOMAS KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANDIVERE et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE and JON KARL THOMPSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv01539
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
THOMAS KANE and CHARLES SAMUELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HARRIS v. KANE et al
as 1:2013cv00879
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., THOMAS KANE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Rice v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-5078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Rice, also known as Anthony Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
RICE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00883
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICE
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
