Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
John Epps v. Thomas Carey
as 08-15598
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDOLPH EPPS
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS L. CAREY
Martinez, et al v. Carey
as 08-55302
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS MARTINEZ, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS L. CAREY
Carey, et al v. USDC-CAN
as 08-70654
: In re: THOMAS L. CAREY
Petitioner: THOMAS L. CAREY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: CROSSAN D. HOOVER, Jr.
Huff v. Carey
as 1:2007cv01746
Petitioner: William T. Huff
Respondent: Thomas L. Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huff v. Carey
as 5:2007cv05610
Plaintiff: William Terry Huff
Defendant: Thomas L. Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Martinez Jr v Thomas L Carey
as 2:2007cv05622
Petitioner: Thomas Martinez, Jr
Respondent: Thomas L Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chattman v. Carey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01298
Petitioner: Elmo Chattman
Respondent: Thomas L. Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmo Chattman v. Thomas L Carey
as 2:2007cv03108
Petitioner: Elmo Chattman
Respondent: Thomas L Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez v. Carey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00718
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Mendez Cato
Defendant: Thomas L. Carey, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro C. Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Carey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00484
Petitioner: Michael Dewayne Haynes
Respondent: Thomas L. Carey and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?