Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Johnny GregoryIn re: Johnny Gregory
as 24-10076
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE and THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 22-10322
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
JUDGE ROBERT B. ADAMS, Superior Court Judge, Whitfield County, PAT UNKNOWN, Judge Adam's Clerk, AMBER WINKLER, Civil Clerk's Office of Whitfield County and others
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 22-10097
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. and ROBERT HARRIS SMALLEY, III
David Wattleton v. Thomas Thrash, Jr.
as 21-12195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
William James, et al v. Barbara Hunt, et al
as 17-14866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES, Sui Juris and TERRI V. TUCKER, Sui Juris a.k.a. Terri V. Donald-Strickland a.k.a. TLo-Redness
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA HUNT, HARPO, LIONSGATE ENTERTAINMENT and others
William Windsor v. Christopher Huber, et al
as 12-10098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, SALLY YATES, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
William Windsor v. Thomas Thrash, et al
as 12-10095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS W. THRASH, CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
William Windsor v. Christopher Huber, et al
as 11-15274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, SALLY YATES, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
William Windsor v. Thomas Thrash, et al
as 11-15276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS W. THRASH, CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
William Windsor v. Christopher Huber, et al
as 11-14848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER, SALLY YATES, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
