Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Village of Bethalto v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08182
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America, Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Village of Bethalto
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Nokomis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
City of Pattonsburg v. Ashland et al
as 1:2010cv08743
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Pattonsburg
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Clean Water Act - Citizen Suits re Environmental Matters
Kennett, City Of et al v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08742
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kennett, City Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 tl Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
City of Lowell Massachusetts v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2005cv04018
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp, doing business as Exxon Mobile Refining and Supply Company doing business as Exxon Chemical USA doing business as ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company individually also known as Arco formerly known as Arco Petroleum Company doing business as Arco Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. individually formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation doing business as Chevron Products Company doing business as Chevron Chemical Company and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Lowell Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Town of East Hampton v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv01720
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company doing business as Arco Products Company formerly known as Arco Petroleum Co. also known as Arco, BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
Town of East Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Coraopolis Water And Sewer Authority v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07874
Plaintiff:
Coraopolis Water and Sewer Authority
Cross Defendant:
Ashland, Inc., Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Sunoco, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation, Coastal Oil New England, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Kouts Town of v. Ashland Inc et al
as 1:2010cv08184
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kouts Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick County School Board v. Amerada Hess Corporation
as 1:2004cv02070
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, El Paso Corporation, Getty Properties Corporation and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
Patrick County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City of Sioux City, Iowa v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv01723
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company ,individualy and doing business as ARCO products Company (f/k/a Arco Petroleum Co.), and also known as ARCO, BP Amoco Chemical Co., Chevron Texaco Corp. ,individualy and formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation (d/b/a Chevron Products Company, d/b/a Chevron Chemical Company) and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Sioux City, Iowa, Galva City of, Ida Grove City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp.
as 15-3934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Orange County Water District
Defendant / Appellee:
Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., NKA TMR Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Shell Oil Company, DBA Shell Oil Products US and others
Defendant:
Unocal Corporation, ConocoPhillips Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., DBA Chevron Products Campany, DBA Chevron Chemical Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Tesoro Petroleum Corporation.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
