Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SPIVEY v. SCHLOFMAN et al
as 4:2020cv00095
Defendant:
PAGE A SMITH, LEONARD SCHLOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. JONES
as 3:2019cv01713
Defendant:
SANDLING SPEEDING, L PRESCOTT, GILEND SAENCES INC and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAULCIN v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00047
Respondent:
J HOLTZ, A CADDLE LOGAN, LEE and others
Petitioner:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
KEYS, MARK S INCH, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haspel v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 8:2018cv03125
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Adams, Nellie Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Haspel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASPEL v. JONES et al
as 1:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HASPEL
Defendant:
G LESLIE, NELLIE LAWSON, J ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulcin v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14319
Defendant:
Lee, Jane Doe, T Rawson and others
Plaintiff:
Prophet Paulcin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WOERNER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kim Brian Woerner
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Julie L. Jones, Tom Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOERNER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
KIM BRIAN WOERNER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JULIE L JONES, TOM REIMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Hower Melendez, Sr.
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Dr. Gonzalo Espino, Warden Reddish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dallas et al
as 3:2017cv01463
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Taylor
Defendant:
John Dallas, Ebony Harvey, K. Luther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
