Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bush v. Wordlaw et al
as 1:2023cv02042
Not Classified By Court:
Circuit Court Clerk Sarah Bradberry
Plaintiff:
Teresa Bush
Defendant:
Calvin Wordlaw, II, Red Classic Transit, LLC and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Bush v. Wordlaw et al
as 2:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
Teresa Bush
Defendant:
Calvin Wordlaw, II, Red Classic Transit, LLC and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Circuit Court Clerk Sarah Bradberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Fox et al v. Mayflower Transit, LLC. et al
as 3:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Dana Ann Fox and William Chandler Fox
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC. and Quinn S.W. Sharkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fletcher et al v. Sharp Transit, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Fletcher and Joyce M. Fletcher
Defendant:
Sharp Transit, LLC and John C. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey v. VIP Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02464
Plaintiff:
Ruby Harvey
Defendant:
VIP Transport, Inc. , Mayflower Transit, LLC a/k/a Interim Mayflower Transit II, LLC and Joseph R. Hardin
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Counter_claimant:
Joseph R. Hardin
Counter_defendant:
Ruby Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Maverick Tube Corporation v. A&H Transportation et al
as 2:2011cv02774
Plaintiff:
Maverick Tube Corporation
Defendant:
A&H Transportation, Advance Business Capital LLC, Angel Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Mayflower Transit, LLC v. Foster
as 2:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Mayflower Transit, LLC
Defendant:
Charles Foster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Puriski et al v. Mayflower Transit, LLC
as 3:2007cv00773
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Puriski and Paula Puriski
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC and Mayflower Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 The Carmack Amendment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
