Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 50 of 243
GRENADIER v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL (WFB) ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC and others
Plaintiff: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. METRO MAN I, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00748
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: METRO MAN I, INC. and METRO MAN I, INC. doing business as WESTWOOD NURSING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE IAM NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. MILSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00687
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE IAM NATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant: MILSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC, XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PLATINUM CLEANING OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
as 1:2022cv00603
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: PLATINUM CLEANING OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA doing business as UAB HOSPITAL, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. TWO EAST OAK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: TWO EAST OAK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, STRATEGIC PROPERTIES OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and TWO EAST OAK REALTY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SDI SECURITY, INC.
as 1:2022cv00410
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: SDI SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. UPMC MCKEESPORT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: UPMC MCKEESPORT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03268
Plaintiff: ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, ARTHUR G. JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL, GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
THOMAS et al v. BANK OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03242
Plaintiff: Darryl W. Thomas, Estate of Wanda D. Thomas and DARRLY W. THOMAS
Defendant: Bank of America, Banc of America Funding Corp Inc., US Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2013 SC3 Title Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?