Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Fardanesh v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
Alireza Fardanesh
Defendant:
United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, Antony J. Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Basari v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Arash Jalali Basari
Defendant:
United States Department of State, United States Embassy in Ankara, Turkey, Anthony J. Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Shahrokhi v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Anahita Shahrokhi
Defendant:
United States Department of State, US Embassy in Ankara,Turkey, Antony Blinkin and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Turkey Knob Growers, Inc. v. East Coast Impex, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01295
Defendant:
Srinivas Sathyavedu Kalyan and East Coast Impex, LLC
Plaintiff:
Turkey Knob Growers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abbass et al v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01186
Defendant:
CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and CACI International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lokha Rida Abbass , Shakir Mohamad , Abdul-Rhman Mansour Mohamad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
