Cases 21 - 30 of 304
Byrd v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
Christine Byrd
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Febus v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00727
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Febus
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meredith v. Endo Pharmaceuticals et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Donna Sue Meredith
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmacueticals Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emerson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mary Emerson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
Mary Moore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eddington v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00409
Plaintiff:
Rosalei May Eddington
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Connie L. Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maynard v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00412
Plaintiff:
Connie Christine Maynard
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Louise Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
