Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Moshe Leichner v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv01036
Defendant:
Bernard Ellis, Federal Bureau of Prisons, GEO Group and others
Plaintiff:
Moshe Leichner
Geiger v. Benov et al
as 1:2011cv01857
Defendant:
Michael Benov and Taft Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Dan S. Geiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Geiger v. Adler et al
as 1:2010cv00715
Respondent:
Neil H. Adler , Federal Bureau of Prisons and Taft Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Dan S. Geiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
v. Adler et al
as 1:2010at00295
Respondent:
Neil H. Adler, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Taft Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Dan S. Geiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Munson v. Adler et al
as 1:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
James Edgar Munson
Respondent:
Neil Adler, Neil Adler, Neil Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stringer v. Adler et al
as 1:2008cv01530
Petitioner:
John Stringer
Respondent:
Neil Adler, Neil Adler, Neil Adler and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edmundo Rubi v. Dennis Smith, et al
as 08-15911
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDMUNDO PARDO RUBI
Respondent - Appellee:
DENNIS SMITH, Warden, TAFT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Kenneth Heath v. Neil Adler, et al
as 08-15460
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH HEATH
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL ADLER, TAFT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION and others
Ruiz v. Adler et al
as 1:2008cv00086
Petitioner:
Diego Salcido Ruiz
Respondent:
Neil Adler, Neil Adler, Neil Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mark Anthony Barragan v. Adler et al
as 1:2008cv00077
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Barragan
Respondent:
Neil Adler, Neil Adler, Neil Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
