Cases 81 - 90 of 119
Norwood v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01855
Plaintiff:
Tamara Norwood
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Organon International, Inc. , Organon USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orr v. Lenke
as 4:2013cv01770
Plaintiff:
Tamara Orr
Defendant:
Lawrence G. Lenke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00803
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pierson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2013cv01509
Plaintiff:
Janice Pierson , Janet Plasse , Karen Coleman and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00071
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Tamara Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Murphy v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv01477
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Tamara Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Evans et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Daryl Evans, Twila Adair, Amy Adamson and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Willis v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
Tamara Willis
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parrish v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
Tamara Parrish
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
McCall v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv04277
Plaintiff:
Tamara McCall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
