Cases 81 - 90 of 536
Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Target Corporation
as 2:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lexos Media IP, LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.,
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Lexos Media IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., and Office Depot, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Michael Dean Paul
Consolidated Defendant:
Target Corporation and Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Leyva v. Target Corporation
as 4:2022cv01458
Plaintiff:
Jessica Michelle Leyva
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Solo Brands, LLC v. Target Corporation
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Solo Brands, LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
INCORRECTLY FILED
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Emilie Wentworth and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wentworth v. Target Corporation
as 7:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Emilie Wentworth
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Kelly v. Target Corporation
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Kelly
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
LedComm LLC v. Target Corporation
as 6:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
LedComm LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC v. Target Corporation
as 6:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
