Cases 1 - 10 of 41
TEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32036
Plaintiff:
MARIO TEASLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
REGINALD TEASLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TEASLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teasley v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robbie Teasley
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Teasley et al v. Cobb
as 1:2022cv05030
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Teasley and Michael Z. Teasley
Defendant:
Donna W. Cobb, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
TEASLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15937
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEE TEASLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Teasley et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Barbara Teasley and Patsy McFalls
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
DORSEY v. THOMAS et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF STEVE THOMAS, CAPTAIN TRACY CLAY and OFFICER TEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
