Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2023cv02522
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, DUBULL, MHORLX Day Day Up Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Parsons Xtreme Golf, LLC v. Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv06672
Plaintiff:
Parsons Xtreme Golf, LLC
Defendant:
Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc., DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. and Golf Galaxy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Galiot v. Midwest Tennis Programs, LLC,
as 1:2017cv04739
Plaintiff:
Marina Galiot
Defendant:
Midwest Tennis Programs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tenny v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv11141
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Tenny
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
CET Tennis Enterprises, LLC et al v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07518
Plaintiff:
CET Tennis Enterprises, LLC and Christina E Turdo
Defendant:
Leggett & Platt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CET Tennis Enterprises, LLC v. Microtech Machines, Inc.
as 1:2014cv05325
Plaintiff:
CET Tennis Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Microtech Machines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Tenny v. Lemke et al
as 1:2013cv01498
Petitioner:
Robert Tenny
Respondent:
Michael Lemke and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
