Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1707
Appellant:
NETLIST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1521
Appellant:
NETLIST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
In re: Micron Technology, Inc.
as 24-107
Petitioner:
In re: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC
Respondent:
NETLIST, INC.
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.
as 24-1312
Appellant:
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC
Appellee:
NETLIST, INC.
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.
as 24-1313
Appellant:
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC
Appellee:
NETLIST, INC.
Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
as 23-2041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VROOM, INC., VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, dba Vroom, dba Texas Direct Auto, CARSTORY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VROOM, INC., VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, dba Vroom, dba Texas Direct Auto, CARSTORY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
as 23-1667
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VROOM, INC., VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, dba Vroom, dba Texas Direct Auto, CARSTORY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
WESTSIDE CHURCH OF CRHIST v. USA
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
WESTSIDE CHURCH OF CRHIST Katy, Texas doing business as CINCO RANCH CHURCH OF CHRIST
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
