Cases 1 - 10 of 8,582
McGee v. Lumpkin
as 24-10737
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Rickey L. McGee
Diaz v. Lumpkin
as 24-20353
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Nelson Diaz
Wilkins v. Lumpkin
as 24-10718
Petitioner:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sandoval v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10702
Petitioner:
Michael A. Powell
Respondent:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
El-Bey v. Lumpkin
as 24-10704
Petitioner:
Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
In re: Salvador Jimenez, III
as 24-10700
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
In re: Salvador Jimenez, III
Evans v. Lumpkin
as 24-50629
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Arthur BurtonIn re: Arthur Burton
as 24-20340
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
In re: Arthur Lee Burton
De Los Reyes v. Lumpkin
as 24-50618
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Francisco De Los Reyes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
