Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15374
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Arc of California, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 16-16762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE ARC OF CALIFORNIA and UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, TERRI DELGADILLO, Director of the California Department of Developmental Services and others
The Arc of California, et al v. Toby Douglas, et al
as 13-16544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE ARC OF CALIFORNIA and UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, TERRI DELGADILLO, Director of the California Department of Developmental Services and others
The Arc of California, et al v. Douglas, et al
as 2:2011cv02545
Plaintiff:
The Arc of California and United Cerebral Palsy Association of San Diego
Defendant:
Toby Douglas , California Department of Health Care Services , Terri Delgadillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396
David Oster, et al v. John Wagner, et al
as 09-17581
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID OSTER, WILLIE BEATRICE SHEPPARD, V.L., by and through his guardian litem Nancy Lagahid and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WAGNER, Director of the California Department of Social Services, DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS, COMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE, CALIFORNIA STATE ORGANIZATION OF THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
