Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Greer v. Mehiel et al
as 1:2015cv06119
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Greer
Defendant:
Dennis Mehiel , Robert Serpico , The Battery Park City Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ag Job Discrimination (Age)
Mejia v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv05676
Plaintiff:
Anita Mejia
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Coast Guard, The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Refund of penalty imposed by I.R.S.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Napolitano v. Battery Park City Authority et al
as 1:2010cv07114
Plaintiff:
Vincent Napolitano
Defendant:
Battery Park City Authority, Empire State Properties, Inc., Hudson Towers Housing Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07025
Plaintiff:
Miguel Morales
Defendant:
City of New York, Battery Park City Authority and New York City Industrial Development Agency
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Martinez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07024
Plaintiff:
Mauro Martinez
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYC Department of Education, NYC School Construction Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
