Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Groundfish Forum, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff: Groundfish Forum, Inc.
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gina Raimondo and others
Intervenor: Central Bering Sea Fisherman's Association, St. Paul, City of, Alaska Longline Fishermen's Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Organized Village of Kake et al v. Perdue et al
as 1:2020cv00011
Plaintiff: The Boat Company, National Audubon Society, The Wilderness Society and others
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council et al v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv00005
Plaintiff: Southeast Alaska Conservation Council , The Boat Company , Alaska Rainforest Defenders and others
Defendant: Earl Stewart , David Zimmerman , United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Greater Southeast Alaska Conservation Community et al v. Stewart et al
as 1:2016cv00009
Plaintiff: Greater Southeast Alaska Conservation Community , Cascadia Wildlands , Greenpeace, Inc. and others
Defendant: Earl Stewart, Beth Pendleton, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
SEACC, et al v. USFS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35232
: In re: BIG THORNE PROJECT AND 2008 TONGASS FOREST PLAN
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Plaintiff: CASCADIA WILDLANDS, GREATER SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COMMUNITY, GREENPEACE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BETH PENDLETON, in her officially capacity as United States Forest Service Region 10 Regional Forester and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA, ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC., SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE and others
The Boat Company, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al
as 14-35883
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE BOAT COMPANY
Intervenor-Plaintiff: FIXED GEAR ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee: PENNY PRITZKER, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, JAMES W. BALSIGER, in his official capacity as Alaska Regional Administrator for the National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
The Boat Company, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al
as 14-35849
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE BOAT COMPANY
Intervenor-Plaintiff: FIXED GEAR ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellant: PENNY PRITZKER, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, JAMES W. BALSIGER, in his official capacity as Alaska Regional Administrator for the National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. Cole et al
as 1:2014cv00015
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands , Greater Southeast Alaska Conservation Community , Greenpeace and others
Defendant: Forrest Cole, Beth Pendleton, Thomas L. Tidwell and others
Movant: State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Boat Company v. Blank et al
as 3:2012cv00250
Plaintiff: The Boat Company
Defendant: Rebecca Blank, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Organized Village of Kake, et al v. AGRI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35517
Plaintiff - Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE, THE BOAT COMPANY, ALASKA WILDERNESS RECREATION AND TOURISM ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor-Defendant: ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?