Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. U.S. International Development Finance Corp
as 22-5095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth and Center for International Environmental Law
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. International Development Finance Corporation
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al
as 1:2021cv01491
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Budha Jam, et al v. International Finance Corp
as 20-7097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sidik Kasam Jam, Navinal Panchayat, Budha Ismail Jam and others
Defendant / Appellee:
International Finance Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manjaliya Ikbal, Parit Abedabanu, Manjaliya Harun and others
Amicus Curiae:
Accountability Counsel, Center for Constitutional Rights, Center for International Environmental Law and others
Budha Jam, et al v. International Finance Corp.
as 20-7092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Machimar Adhikar Sangharash Sangathan, (MASS), Navinal Panchayat, Budha Ismail Jam and others
Defendant / Appellee:
International Finance Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Accountability Counsel, Center for Constitutional Rights, Center for International Environmental Law and others
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al
as 4:2017cv02824
Plaintiff:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. , Resolute FP US, Inc. , Resolute FP Augusta, LLC and others
Defendant:
Greenpeace International , Greenpeace, Inc. , Greenpeace Fund, Inc. and others
Movant:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 11 additional media organizations
Amicu:
Alaska Wilderness League , Center for Biological Diversity , Center for international Environmental Law and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK et al v. EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv01820
Plaintiff:
CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK , FRIENDS OF THE EARTH , SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES and FRED P. HOCHBERG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Chesapeake Climate Action Network et al v. Export-Import Bank of the United States et al
as 3:2013cv03532
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Climate Action Network , Friends of the Earth , Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Export-Import Bank of the United States and Fred P. Hochberg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Center For International v. Office of the US Trade Rep., et al
as 12-5136
Amicus Curiae:
The New York Times Company, First Amendment Coalition, North Jersey Media Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Center for International Environmental Law
Defendant / Appellant:
Ron Kirk, in his official capacity as the United States Trade Representative, Michael Froman, in his official capacity as the United States Trade Representative, Office of the United States Trade Representative and others
Friends of the Earth et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2011cv02419
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Earth , The Center for International Environmental Law and Corporate Ethics International
Defendant:
United States Department of State and Hilary Clinton
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Castlewood Prod, et al v. Norton, Gale, et al
as 03-5161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Castlewood Products, L.L.C., M. Bohlke Veneer Corp. and United Veneer, L.L.C.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Interforest Corp., Marwood Inc., Veneer Technologies and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, In her official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Interior, United States Department of the Interior, Steven A. Williams, In his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Defenders of Wildlife, Greenpeace, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
