Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Coalition on Homelessness, et al v. City and County of San Francisco, et al
as 23-15087
Plaintiff / Appellee: COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS, TORO CASTANO, SARAH CRONK and others
Defendant / Appellant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and others
Amicus Curiae: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and others
Coalition on Homelessness et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv05502
Plaintiff: Coalition on Homelessness, Toro Castao, Sarah Cronk and others
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Department of Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, et al v. David Chiu, et al
as 22-15824
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAN FRANCISCANS SUPPORTING PROP B, EDWIN M LEE ASIAN PACIFIC DEMOCRATIC CLUB PAC SPONSORED BY NEIGHBORS FOR A BETTER SAN FRANCISCO ADVOCACY and TODD DAVID
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID CHIU, in his official capacity as San Francisco City Attorney, SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION, CHESA BOUDIN, in his official capacity as San Francisco District Attorney and others
San Franciscans Supporting Prop B et al v. Chiu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02785
Plaintiff: San Franciscans Supporting Prop B, Edwin M Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club PAC Sponsored by Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy and Todd David
Defendant: David Chiu, San Francisco Ethics Commission, Chesa Boudin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doordash, Inc. et al v. City and County of San Francisco We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05502
Plaintiff: Doordash, Inc. and GrubHub Inc.
Defendant: San Francisco City and County and City and County of San Francisco
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America and California Chamber of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
International Fur Trade Federation v. City and County of San Francisco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00242
Defendant: Dr. Grant Colfax and City and County of San Francisco
Plaintiff: International Fur Trade Federation
Intervenor Defendant: Animal Legal Defense Fund and Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Virginia Duncan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-56081
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, GAYS AGAINST GUNS, PRIDE FUND TO END GUN VIOLENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHRISTOPHER WADDELL, VIRGINIA DUNCAN, DAVID MARGUGLIO and others
Defendant / Appellant: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
San Francisco Apartment Association et al v. City and County of San Francisco We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01545
Plaintiff: San Francisco Apartment Association , Coalition for Better Housing , Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute and others
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cunningham v. Schopp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03033
Plaintiff: Archibald Cunningham
Defendant: Maria Schopp , Patrick J. Mahoney, Mary Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05351
Plaintiff: San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association , Larry Barsetti , Rainerio Granados and others
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco , Edwin Lee and Greg Suhr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?