Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Norfolk, Virginia et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
City of Norfolk, Virginia and Norfolk City Council
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Gregory D. Underwood, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Norfolk and Mark R. Herring, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia
Intervenor:
Ronald M. Green and Roy L. Perry-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Norfolk, VA v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Norfolk, VA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Appomattox River Water Authority et al v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Appomattox River Water Authority , County of Chesterfield , County Of Henrico and others
Defendant:
General Chemical Corporation, General Chemical Performance Products, LLC, General Chemical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERRY-BEY et al v. CITY OF NORFOLK VIRGINIA et al
as 2:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk, Paul D. Fraim, ANTHONY L. BURFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2010mc00024
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Regina V.K. Williams, Bernard A. Pishko and others
Scott v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2010mc00020
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Regina V.K. Williams, Bernard A. Pishko and others
Scott v. Norfolk Circuit Court et al
as 2:2010mc00011
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
Norfolk Circuit Court, Everett A. Martin, Jr., City of Norfolk and others
Lagey et al v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 1:2006cv01416
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Lagey and Marian L. Lagey
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
