Contract Cases filed in Pennsylvania
PYATANOV v. ARROW TRUCK SALES, INC.
as 2:2023cv02148
Lead Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR PYATANOV
Defendant: DEFENDANT ARROW TRUCK SALES and ARROW TRUCK SALES, INC.
Plaintiff: VLADIMIR A. PYATANOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PYATANOV
as 2:2023cv02151
Lead Plaintiff: PLAINTIFF VLADIMIR PYATANOV
Defendant: DEFENDANTS ARROW TRUCK SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Redhouse et al v. BECK et al
as 2:2021cv04549
Plaintiff: Richard Redhouse, Redhouse Franchise, INC and Redhouse Bagels and Deli, LLC
Defendant: DAVID BECK, Defendant DKL Bagel LLC and Defendant DKL Bagel II LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
ABRAHAM et al v. GREATER NEW CASTLE COMMUNITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00632
Plaintiff: TODD A. ABRAHAM and RONALD C. ABRAHAM
Defendant: GREATER NEW CASTLE COMMUNITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, HARRY A. PASSERRELLO, NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TIFFIN et al
as 2:2015cv01323
Plaintiff: STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: DANIEL J. TIFFIN, LINDA A. TIFFIN, BRADLEY D. TIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
HICKS et al v. DEFENDERS SECURITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv06058
Plaintiff: NORMAN HICKS and LINDA SCAVELLO
Defendant: DEFENDERS SECURITY COMPANY , ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. , ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS NORTHEAST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WILLIAMSON v. CORDANI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03239
Plaintiff: KAREN WILLIAMSON
Defendant: DAVID CORDANI, UNKNOWN CIGNA EMPLOYEES AS INDIVIDUALS and UNKNOWN LOCATIONS AS DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?