Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Grace Cannata v. The Gillette Company, et al
as 14-14272
Interested Party - Appellant:
GRACE M. CANNATA
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
Wanda Cochran v. The Gillette Co., et al
as 14-14221
Interested Party - Appellant:
WANDA J. COCHRAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
Robert Falkner v. The Gillette Co, et al
as 14-14165
Interested Party - Appellant:
ROBERT FALKNER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
Theodore Frank v. The Gillette Co., et al
as 14-14170
Interested Party - Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
Christopher Batman, et al v. The Gillette Co., et al
as 14-13882
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BATMAN, THEODORE H. FRANK, ROBERT FALKNER and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
:
WENDY L. YOUNG, GRACE M. CANNATA, PAUL DORSEY and others
Poertner v. The Gillette Company et al
as 6:2012cv00803
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Poertner
Defendant:
The Gillette Company and Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davorn v. The Gillette Company, Duracell Braun et al
as 3:2007cv01055
Plaintiff:
Davis Julius Davorn
Defendant:
The Gillette Company, Duracell Braun, Ms. Holton, G. Wellhausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
