Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
NBL FLOORING, INC. v. TRUMBALL INSURANCE CO. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04398
Plaintiff: NBL FLOORING, INC.
Defendant: TRUMBALL INSURANCE CO. and THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC..
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MCDERMOTT v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03706
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MCDERMOTT
Defendant: THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. and PATHMARK STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
PATTERSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00479
Plaintiff: BARRY D. PATTERSON
Defendant: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFORD LIFE, INC. and THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Laughman et al v. Ace American Insurance et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00695
Plaintiff: Alyssa Laughman, Jean C. Laughman and Tilghman Laughman
Defendant: Ace American Insurance, Ace American Insurance, Ace American Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Kane et al v. Waltrip et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01883
Plaintiff: Christopher Kane and Linda Kane
Defendant: Janet Waltrip, Hartford Group of Affiliated Insurance Companies, Hartford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
BRIGGS v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05190
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BRIGGS and WILLIAM BRIGGS
Defendant: THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. and PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?