Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
North Slope Borough, Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope et al v. Ross et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Plaintiff: North Slope Borough, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation and Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope
Defendant: Wilbur Ross and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Alaska Oil and Gas Association, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al
as 14-35811
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: PENNY PRITZKER, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, INC.
Alaska Oil and Gas Association, et al v. Penny Pritzker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35806
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant - Appellant: PENNY PRITZKER, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35287
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, INUPIAT COMMUNITY OF THE ARCTIC SLOPE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE and others
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and TOMMY BEAUDREAU, Director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: SHELL GULF OF MEXICO, INC., CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation et al v. Salazar et al
as 3:2011cv00106
Plaintiff: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation , The North Slope Borough , NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. and others
Defendant: Ken Salazar, Rowan W. Gould and United States Fish And Wildlife Service
Intervenor_defendant: Center for Biological Diversity , Defenders of Wildlife and Greenpeace, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 10-35932
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, CITY OF POINT HOPE, INUPIAT COMMUNITY OF THE ARCTIC SLOPE and others
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, RANDALL B. LUTHI, Director of Minerals Management Service, MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant: SHELL GULF OF MEXICO, INC., CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and STATE OF ALASKA
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 10-35902
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, CITY OF POINT HOPE, INUPIAT COMMUNITY OF THE ARCTIC SLOPE and others
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, RANDALL B. LUTHI, Director of Minerals Management Service, MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant: SHELL GULF OF MEXICO, INC., CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska Eskimo Whaling Comm, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 10-70368
Petitioner: ALASKA ESKIMO WHALING COMMISSION and INUPIAT COMMUNITY OF THE ARCTIC SLOPE
Respondent: KEN SALAZAR, Secretary Of The Interior and MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Respondent-Intervenor: SHELL GULF OF MEXICO INC.
Alaska Eskimo Whaling Comm, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 09-73944
Petitioner: ALASKA ESKIMO WHALING COMMISSION and INUPIAT COMMUNITY OF THE ARCTIC SLOPE
Intervenor: SHELL OFFSHORE INC. and STATE OF ALASKA
Respondent: KEN SALAZAR, Secretary Of The Interior and MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Native Village of Point Hope et al v. Kempthorne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff: Native Village of Point Hope, City of Point Hope, Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope and others
Defendant: Dirk Kempthorne, Randall B Luthi, Minerals Management Service and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?