Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Most Wanted Motorsports LLC v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02936
Defendant:
Paige A Thompson, Does 1-10, Amazon Web Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Most Wanted Motorsports LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Supreme Council, 33 Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Prince Hall Affiliation, Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America et al v. United Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite for the 33 De
as 1:2016cv01103
Plaintiff:
United Supreme Council, 33 Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Prince Hall Affiliation, Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America and United Supreme Council 33 (Thirty-Three) of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (Prince Hall Affiliation) Southern Jurisdiction U.S., Grand Orient at Washington, District Of Columbia
Defendant:
United Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite for the 33 Degree of Freemasonry, Prince Hall Affiliated, Ralph Slaughter, Joseph A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles Mystic Shrine of North and South America and its Jurisidiction, Inc. et al v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Virginia, Free and Accepted Masons, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00521
Plaintiff:
Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles Mystic Shrine of North and South America and its Jurisidiction, Inc. and Oliver Washington, Jr., Imperial Potentate, Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order Nobles Mystic Shrine of North and South america and its Jurisidiction, Inc.
Defendant:
Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Virginia, Free and Accepted Masons, Inc., Larry D. Christian, Grand Chapter Order of the Eastern Star of Virginia Prince Hall Affiliation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
