Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The Cherokee Nation et al v. Stitt
as 5:2019cv01198
Counter Defendant:
Chickasaw Nation, The
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Nation, The and Choctaw Nation, The
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Quapaw Nation, Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, The Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45402
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
OTOE-MISSOURIA TRIBE OF INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dillon v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2016mc00005
Plaintiff:
James Dillon
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. , Four Oaks Bank & Trust, Generations Federal Credit Union and others
Movant:
Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, The
The Otoe-Missouria Tribe of In v. New York State Department of F
as 13-3769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe, Great Plains Lending, LLC, a wholly-owned tribal limited liability company, American Web Loan, Inc., a wholly-owned tribal corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Financial Services and Benjamin M. Lawsky, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services
The Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians et al v. New York State Department of Financial Services et al
as 1:2013cv05930
Plaintiff:
The Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians , Great Plains Lending, LLC , American Web Loan, Inc. and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Financial Services and Benjamin M. Lawsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xerox Corporation v. Otoe Missouria Tribe of Indians
as 5:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation and Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Otoe Missouria Tribe of Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
