Cases 81 - 90 of 504
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2019cv11661
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spoor v. The People Of The State Of New York
as 1:2019cv01675
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of New York
Petitioner:
Ronald Spoor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv10902
Petitioner:
Hayes Leroy and Leroy Hayes
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 9:2019cv01291
Defendant:
Cape Vincent Correctional Facility and The People of the State of New York
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornell v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 9:2019cv01292
Defendant:
Bare Hill Correctional Facility and The People of the State of New York
Plaintiff:
Tyler Cornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chess v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2019cv06671
Petitioner:
Michael T. Chess
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 1:2019cv08166
Defendant:
A.D.A.C. Rivet, Det. J. Quilty, John D. and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Tynon
as 9:2019cv01016
Petitioner:
Jack Taylor, Jr., Jack Lee Taylor and Jack Lee Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York and Teresa Tynon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Smalls et al
as 1:2019cv07685
Petitioner:
Arthur L. Brown
Respondent:
Warden Kisa Smalls and The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Eldridge v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2019cv07763
Petitioner:
Mike Eldridge
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Defendant:
Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
