Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Doe, 59 et al v. Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 3:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
James Doe, 59, James Doe, 60, James Doe, 61 and others
Defendant:
Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, Society of Jesus, Alaska, Society of Jesus, Father General Adolfo Nicholas, SJ and His Predecessors and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Doe et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 3:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
James Doe, 59, James Doe, 60, James Doe, 61 and others
Defendant:
The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska, The Society of Jesus, Father General Adolfo Nicholas, SJ and His Predecessors and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Doe, 1 et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 4:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, 1, Jane Doe, 2, Jane Doe, 3 and others
Defendant:
The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska and The Pioneer Educational Society
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Doe et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 4:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Doe, 59, James Doe, 60, James Doe, 61 and others
Defendant:
The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 4:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Doe, 59, James Doe, 60, James Doe, 61 and others
Defendant:
The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 4:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
James Doe, 59, James Doe, 60, James Doe, 61 and others
Defendant:
The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska, The Society of Jesus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
