Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23793
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00261
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20318
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv23167
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Cibrano v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
as 1:2019cv22867
Defendant: The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Ivy Cibrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Fox v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10361
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL FOX
Defendant / Appellee: THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00636
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rook v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03027
Plaintiff: Sharon Rook
Defendant: Marriott International, Inc. , The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. , John Doe(s) 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George De La Flor, et al v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-12411
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE L DE LA FLOR, SUSANNE DE LA FLOR, TRISTAN ALEXANDER DE LA FLOR, a minor and others
Defendant - Appellee: THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C. and MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00362
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?