Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Shop Teks Equipment Specialists, Inc. v. NorAM, Inc.
as 7:2012cv00962
Plaintiff:
Shop Teks Equipment Specialists, Inc.
Defendant:
NorAM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Medicare Advantage Specialist, Inc. v. Full Circle Financial Group, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02207
Plaintiff:
Medicare Advantage Specialist, Inc.
Defendant:
Full Circle Financial Group, LLC and Michael E. Lees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
EMCASCO Insurance Company v. Sizemore et al
as 3:2010cv02055
Plaintiff:
EMCASCO Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mary B Sizemore, Brent Sizemore, Danny Blackstock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US Express Leasing, Inc. v. Physical Therapy Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
US Express Leasing, Inc.
Defendant:
Physical Therapy Specialists, Inc., Michael R. Land and Melissa K. Land
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Madison Research Corp v. Global Photovoltaic Specialists, Inc.
as 5:2008cv00630
Plaintiff:
Madison Research Corp and Madison Research Corp
Defendant:
Global Photovoltaic Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
