Cases 21 - 30 of 2,089
Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marshall v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1938
Plaintiff:
GUS WHO MARSHALL
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, VALLEY WATER, State owned company and others
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Chukwu v. People of the State of California
as 24-1751
Petitioner:
CHUKWU OBINNA
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation, et al.
as 24-1727
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BECK
Defendant:
CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, RUBEN DURAN and others
Beck v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1520
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BECK
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUZANNE GRANDT, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Sjodin v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1368
Petitioner:
KIRK ARDELL SJODIN, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and COUNTY OF KERN, Kern County Commissioners District Attorney
The People of the State of California v. Dylan Perry et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California and Dylan Scott Perry
Defendant:
Board and CEO of Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County doing business as L.A. Care Health Plan doing business as L.A. Care Plan de Salud and The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yasmintheresa Garsiyya Bey v. Marie Elena Wood et al
as 5:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Yasmintheresa Garsiyya Bey
Defendant:
Judge Marie Elena Wood, Attorney Michelle Brooker, Couper Smith Hagans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
