Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NELSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
BEN RUSSELL, DAVID WAITE, KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
v. NELSON et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
BRETT-ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
DONALD CORWIN JACKSON, LORI BETH TALBOT, ASHKEY MORGAN BURGEMEISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDREW v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2021cv01912
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW
Defendant:
KENNETH MURRAY, KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ, DAVID MARK WAITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01409
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, SETH RYAN, DAVID WAITE and others
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PENK v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO et al
as 1:2020cv00378
Plaintiff:
PAGE DAVID PENK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR/EMPLOYMENT and GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Jones v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 10-7124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Jindal, Governor, State of Louisiana, Sue P. Everhart, Republican Party of Louisiana and others
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Newdow, et al v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 09-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Arthur Newdow, Ellery Schempp, Mel Lipman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Presidential Inaugural Committee, PIC, Emmett Beliveau, Executive Director, PIC and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
State of Texas, American Center for Law and Justice, State of Alabama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
