Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Cissna et al
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, United Nations (U.N.) and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron v. Unknown Agents of the State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv04759
Petitioner:
Jacob Bergeron
Respondent:
Unknown Agents of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargreaves v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv08702
Plaintiff:
Chad Hargreaves
Defendant:
Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit, State of Georgia, State of Georgia, American Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv03752
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe, Sherrif Thomas, Captain Sisk and others
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2018cv03284
Plaintiff:
Karin Elizabeth Sims
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The State of Georgia, The State of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. State of Vermont
as 18-817
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bahji Adams
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Vermont and State of Georgia
Blash v. State of Georgia
as 1:2018cv00407
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blash
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2017cv00114
Petitioner:
Bahji Adams
Respondent:
State of Vermont and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
