Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lopez et al v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv01161
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Rosemary McCrary, Brigido Bayawa and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Lopez and Colleen Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pattison v. State of Nevada, et al
as 3:2019cv00406
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Ex Rel, Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. State of Nevada Ex Rel Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00221
Plaintiff:
Omari Naeem Bey
Defendant:
Correctional Office Franco, Director Greg Cox, State of Nevada Ex Rel Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Furtado et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Estate of Andrew Thurgood and Marty Joe Furtado
Defendant:
Adam Michael Isaacson, State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Departement of Corrections and Anthony M Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randolph v. The State of Nevada, Ex Rel, Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00148
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Century Link Sales Solutions, Inc., James Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Breakman v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00004
Defendant:
Robert B. Bannister and State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Breakman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
