Cases 41 - 50 of 635
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv07229
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NICHOLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
ROY ALLEN NICHOLS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALTON v. EAN HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06403
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA WALTON
Defendant:
EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, JACK F PETERSON, EAN HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SIKES v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
EDWARD GILL SIKES
Respondent:
PISTRO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEGG v. GABBY
as 4:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
TANYA M LEGG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROYAL v. GABBY
as 4:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
VANESSA STAR ROYAL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. WARDEN FCI TALLAHASSEE
as 3:2023cv04674
Petitioner:
BETTY J JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN FCI TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DICKEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R DICKEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CRANDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2023cv00079
Petitioner:
SYDNEY ANDREA CRANDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LINTHICOME v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
ROSALEE LUCRITTA LINTHICOME
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
