Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SOOS v. ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2020cv00291
Defendant:
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY and UNITED STEEL PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. SOOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC v. KEYSTONE CEMENT CO.
as 5:2019cv05366
Defendant:
KEYSTONE CEMENT CO.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC v. COLONIAL METALS CO.
as 5:2018cv03727
Defendant:
COLONIAL METALS CO.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BELCZYK et al v. BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
FRANK BELCZYK , SOPHIE BELCZYK , MICHAEL JURICH and others
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC., BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
CENVEO CORPORATION v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
as 2:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
CENVEO CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Gressens v. Ashland Foundry & Machine Works, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01089
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gressens
Defendant:
Ashland Foundry & Machine Works, Inc., United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC and United Steel Workers of America Local Union 14372
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ZANGHI et al v. FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. ZANGHI , KENNETH J. SOWERS , DOMINIC MCCUCH and others
Defendant:
FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC. , JOHNSTOWN AMERICA CORPORATION and JOHNSTOWN AMERICA CORPORATION USWA HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ENERGY INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC. et al v. THE UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC
as 2:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
ENERGY INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC. and ENERGY INTELLIGENCE GROUP (UK) LIMITED
Defendant:
THE UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC et al
as 2:2010cv02845
Plaintiff:
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC and UNITED STEELWORKERS LOCAL 88 G
Counter_claimant:
UNITED STEELWORKERS LOCAL 88 G and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Counter_defendant:
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BURNS v. SALEM TUBE, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BURNS
Defendant:
SALEM TUBE, INCORPORATED and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, LOCAL 3713-05
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
