Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff: LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Salinas Valley Corporation v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 2:2023at00556
Plaintiff: Salinas Valley Corporation
Defendant: American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Salinas Valley Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01121
Plaintiff: Salinas Valley Corporation
Defendant: American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-55209
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and XAVIER BECERRA, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 23-55157
Plaintiff / Appellee: KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00698
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Al Faustino De Guzman et al v. Pacifica of the Valley Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv04601
Defendant: Gregg Yost, Pacifica of the Valley Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff: Al Fuastino De Guzman
Petitioner: Assibu Abudu and Precious Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gym Management Services, Inc., et al v. Vantapro Specialty Insurance C, et al
as 21-55231
Plaintiff / Appellant: CULVER CITY CORPORATE FITNESS, INC., a California corporation, LOS ANGELES CORPORATE FITNESS, INC., a California corporation, SIMI VALLEY CORPORATE FITNESS, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant: CARE PROVIDERS INSURANCE SERVICES LLC, Texas Limited Liability Corporation and DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Defendant / Appellee: VANTAPRO SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation
Gym Management Services, Inc. v. Vantapro Specialty Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv09541
Defendant: Vantapro Specialty Insurance Company, Care Providers Insurance Services LLC Texas Limited Liability Corporation doing business as NSM Insurance Group and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Plaintiff: Gym Management Services, Inc., West Covina Corporate Fitness, Inc., Simi Valley Corporate Fitness, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Enloe Medical Center et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv09278
Plaintiff: County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems-Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino doing business as Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital, a California Limited Partnership doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?