Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ace American Insurance Company v. Exide Technologies, Inc., et al
as 17-15392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a.k.a. Exide Technologies f.k.a. Exide Corporation, A Delaware Corporation and THE WATTLES COMPANY, a Washington corporation
ACE American Insurance Company v. Exide Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01600
Plaintiff:
ACE American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Exide Technologies, Inc. and The Wattles Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Wattles Company v. ACE American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00507
Plaintiff:
The Wattles Company
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company and Exide Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
The Wattles Company
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company, Verlan Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
The Wattles Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv05097
Plaintiff:
The Wattles Company
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company , Verlan Fire Insurance Company , Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
