Cases 1 - 10 of 1,155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Nevius v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nevius
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oelker v. Idaho State Bar (ISB) et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Jeromy Oelker
Respondent:
Idaho State Bar (ISB), Director Diane Minnich and Attorney Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Concealed Coalition, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Noah Thomas
Defendant:
Concealed Coalition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Crow LLC v. Bayeh et al
as 2:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Crow LLC
Defendant:
Edgar Bayeh, Zilla Management LLC and Thomas Bayeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Cartagenova et al v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Mari Cartagenova, Stephanie McWilliams, Thomas Sakowych and others
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cartagenova et al v. ko et al
as 2:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Mari Cartagenova, Stephanie McWilliams and Thomas Sakowych
Defendant:
Jasper ko and MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Supranovich v. Julio et al
as 2:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Thomas Supranovich
Defendant:
Juan Julio, Gabriela Najera, James E. Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deangelis v. Anavex Life Sciences Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Denise Deangelis
Defendant:
Christopher Missling, Peter Donhauser, Jiong Ma and others
Thomas v. Simas et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Thomas
Defendant:
Martha Simas, Hartman, Dutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
