Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside, et al
as 20-55496
Defendant:
DOES, 1, 2, 3, NURSE PRACTITIONER, GEMENDE, Sergeant
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Sheriffs Department, DAVID KRONDRIT, STAN SNIFF
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BODNAR
In re: Bodnar
as 20-125
Petitioner:
HERZL RAGINE, M.D., RICHARD NEUSER, J. THOMAS CONKLIN TRUST
and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
(PC) Bodnar v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2018cv02702
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
Jeremy Coles, Domingo Aguilar, James Rokop
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04454
Defendant:
Detective Dino Anselmo, Detective Luis Batista, Detective Billie
and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2017cv01463
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Doe 1, Doe 2
and others
Thomas Bodnar v. Maddax et al
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
Maddax, P Johnson, S. Sisodia
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Bodnar v. Maddax et al
as 5:2017cv01215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
P. Johnson, Maddax, G. Sanchez
and others
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside, et al
as 17-55277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BODNAR
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, J. WHITTING, individually and as a Sheriff's Department Employee, T. TORRENTI, individually and as a Sheriff's Department Employee
and others
NORTON v. STOP AND SHOP STORE #830 et al
as 3:2016cv09385
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. NORTON
Defendant:
STOP AND SHOP STORE #830 , AHOLD USA , BARBARA BODNAR
and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Bodnar v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Maddox, P. Johnson
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
