Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Boster v. Ricci et al
as 1:2023cv06186
Plaintiff:
Amanda Boster
Defendant:
Jonathan Ricci, Charles L. Jemley, Brian Maxwell and others
Nominal Defendant:
Dutch Bros Inc.
Wakefield v. Ricci et al
as 1:2023cv05653
Plaintiff:
Darren Wakefield
Defendant:
Jonathan Ricci, Charles L. Jemley, Travis Boersma and others
Nominal Defendant:
Dutch Bros Inc.
Hudson v. Ricci et al
as 1:2023cv05010
Plaintiff:
Brennan Hudson
Defendant:
Jonathan Ricci, Charles L. Jemley, Travis Boersma and others
Nominal Defendant:
Dutch Bros Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Amanda Boster and Darren Wakefield
Daly, Jr. et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11780
Plaintiff:
Michael Gavroy, Gerard Finegan, Michael P Giacoppo and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Davis v. Bob et al
as 1:2014cv02654
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Bob, Scalen, Mrs. Tsai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv06316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Davis v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08646
Plaintiff:
James McGown
Defendant:
The City of New York, Edward Mungin, Edward Mungin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGown v. Mayors Office of Special Enforcement et al
as 1:2009cv04991
Plaintiff:
James McGown
Defendant:
Mayors Office of Special Enforcement, Mike Bloomberg, Edward Sklar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Arroyo et al
as 1:2009cv01703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Jose Arroyo, Mark Mereegen, Brain Sullivman (MFY) and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
