Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. Timothy Robbins, et al
as 13-56755
Petitioner - Appellant: ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, ABDIRIZAK ADEN FARAH, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO and others
Petitioner: EFREN OROZCO
Respondent - Appellee: TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, WESLEY LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05042
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05068
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jose Antonio Franco-Gonzalez v. Janet Napolitano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02211
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, John T. Morton and others
Petitioner: Maksim Zhalezny, Jonas Woldemariam, Juan Carlos Sepulveda-Perez and others
Interested Party: Kevin Lapp and Katherine Byrne Mahoney
Special Master: A Howard Matz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rudolph Michael Mosqueda v. Janet Ann Napolitano et al
as 8:2009cv01041
Plaintiff: Rudolph M Mosqueda
Defendant: Janet Ann Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jane Arellano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03223
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?