Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, et al v. Thomas Bostick, et al
as 15-30952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATCHAFALAYA BASINKEEPER and LOUISIANA CRAWFISH PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION - WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutentant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Black Warrior Riverkeeper, In, et al v. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-14745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor - Appellee:
ALABAMA COAL ASSOCIATION, MS & R EQUIPMENT CO., INC., REED MINERALS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and JON CHYTKA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District
One Hundred Miles, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-3948
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
ONE HUNDRED MILES and SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
American Farm Bureau Fedn, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-3850
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Natural Resources Defense Cnsl v. EPA, et al
as 15-3820
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
National Wildlife Federation v. EPA, et al
as 15-3817
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as GAN/1:15-cv-02488
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. , Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Association, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , United States Army Corps of Engineers , Gina McCarthy and others
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as TXS/3:15-cv-00165
Plaintiff:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Petroleum Institute , American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Regina McCarthy , U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Movant:
Eugene P Holmes and Penny Sisson
National Wildlife Federation v. EPA, et al
as 15-1234
Petitioner:
National Wildlife Federation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, Administrator, in her official capacity, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2015cv02488
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. , Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and Greater Atlanta Homebuilders Association, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , United States Army Corps of Engineers , Gina McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
